Re: Another spurious failure

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 23/09/2014, at 7:38 PM, Harshavardhana wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 11:10 AM, Justin Clift <justin@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On 23/09/2014, at 1:00 AM, Harshavardhana wrote:
>>> Test Summary Report
>>> -------------------
>>> ./tests/bugs/bug-1109770.t                         (Wstat: 0 Tests: 19
>>> Failed: 1)
>>> Failed test:  13
>>> Files=280, Tests=8149, 5589 wallclock secs ( 3.35 usr  1.97 sys +
>>> 487.14 cusr 657.94 csys = 1150.40 CPU)
>> <snip>
>> 
>> Yeah, seen this several times as well.  We're being impacted by spurious
>> failures pretty often again lately. :(
>> 
>> git blame shows Raghavendra Bhat and Manu as the two authors for that
>> test.  Maybe one of them would have time to look into it?
> 
> A patch was sent out and its fixed apparently in latest master and release-3.6


Cool. :)

+ Justin

--
GlusterFS - http://www.gluster.org

An open source, distributed file system scaling to several
petabytes, and handling thousands of clients.

My personal twitter: twitter.com/realjustinclift

_______________________________________________
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel




[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Users]     [Ceph Users]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux