Re: Another spurious failure

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 23/09/2014, at 1:00 AM, Harshavardhana wrote:
> Test Summary Report
> -------------------
> ./tests/bugs/bug-1109770.t                         (Wstat: 0 Tests: 19
> Failed: 1)
>  Failed test:  13
> Files=280, Tests=8149, 5589 wallclock secs ( 3.35 usr  1.97 sys +
> 487.14 cusr 657.94 csys = 1150.40 CPU)
<snip>

Yeah, seen this several times as well.  We're being impacted by spurious
failures pretty often again lately. :(

git blame shows Raghavendra Bhat and Manu as the two authors for that
test.  Maybe one of them would have time to look into it?

+ Justin

--
GlusterFS - http://www.gluster.org

An open source, distributed file system scaling to several
petabytes, and handling thousands of clients.

My personal twitter: twitter.com/realjustinclift

_______________________________________________
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel




[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Users]     [Ceph Users]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux