Re: [fuse-devel] Feature proposal - FS-Cache support in FUSE

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 






On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 7:20 AM, Miklos Szeredi <miklos@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> This would be a challenge with any FUSE based filesystem which has
>> persistent filehandles larger than 64bit.

Fuse does provide a total of 128bits of file handle identification
with nodeID + generation, with some of that number-space reserved for
special uses, unfortunately.

Would be nice to provide for arbitrary file handle lengths.   Will
look into that, at least for the libfuse-3.0 API.

This is something beyond the libfuse API. Unless the kernel/user ABI is modified to present the entire 128bits with each call (i.e, both nodeID + generation instead of just nodeID) we are still bound to provide unique 64bit nodeID (and persistent for anything living across umount/mount). This is perhaps the biggest reason why GlusterFS implemented its own NFS server for v3 and uses NFS-Ganesha for v4, instead of using kNFSd.

Thanks
_______________________________________________
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel

[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Users]     [Ceph Users]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux