I'll do that, if someone could point me to it. Is it on the community wiki or in doc/ directory in the source? ~kaushal On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 1:12 PM, Niels de Vos <ndevos@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 12:21:56PM +0530, Kaushal M wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> Currently we name tests associated with a bug with just the bug-id as >> 'bug-XXXXXXX.t'. This naming doesn't provide any context directly, and >> someone looking at just the name wouldn't know what it does. >> >> I suggest that we use slightly more descriptive names to the tests. >> Lets name the tests as 'bug-XXXXXXX-checking-if-feature-Y-works.t'. >> This provides just enough context to understand what the test is >> trying to do from just the name. >> >> How do you all feel about this? > > Sounds good to me. Please make sure to update the documentation about > writing test-cases in a few days, if nobody objects. > > Thanks, > Niels _______________________________________________ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
