On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 12:21:56PM +0530, Kaushal M wrote: > Hi all, > > Currently we name tests associated with a bug with just the bug-id as > 'bug-XXXXXXX.t'. This naming doesn't provide any context directly, and > someone looking at just the name wouldn't know what it does. > > I suggest that we use slightly more descriptive names to the tests. > Lets name the tests as 'bug-XXXXXXX-checking-if-feature-Y-works.t'. > This provides just enough context to understand what the test is > trying to do from just the name. > > How do you all feel about this? Sounds good to me. Please make sure to update the documentation about writing test-cases in a few days, if nobody objects. Thanks, Niels _______________________________________________ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
