On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 4:01 AM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri <pkarampu@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Nope :-(
On 06/19/2014 11:32 PM, Justin Clift wrote:
On 19/06/2014, at 6:55 PM, Benjamin Turner wrote:
<snip>
I went through these a while back and removed anything that wasn't valid for GlusterFS. This test was passing on 3.4.59 when it was released, i am thinking it may have something to do with a sym link to the same directory bz i found a while back? Idk, I'll get it sorted tomorrow.Any ideas? :)
I got this sorted, I needed to add a sleep between the file create and the link. I ran through it manually and it worked every time, took me a few goes to think of timing issue. I didn't need this on 3.4.0.59, is there anything that needs investigated?
Ok no problem. I was unable to repro outside the script and I tried everything I could think of. I am just going to leave the sleep 1s in there and keep an eye on these moving forward. Thanks guys!
-b
Pranith
+ Justin
--
GlusterFS - http://www.gluster.org
An open source, distributed file system scaling to several
petabytes, and handling thousands of clients.
My personal twitter: twitter.com/realjustinclift
_______________________________________________
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
_______________________________________________ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
