On 17/06/2014, at 11:33 PM, Benjamin Turner wrote:
> Here are the tests that failed. Note that n0 is a generated name, name255 is a 255 character string, and path 1023 is a 1023 long path
>
> /opt/qa/tools/posix-testsuite/tests/link/02.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 10 Failed: 2)
> Failed tests: 4, 6
>
> expect 0 link ${n0} ${name255} #4
> expect 0 unlink ${n0} #5 <- this passed
> expect 0 unlink ${name255} #6
>
> /opt/qa/tools/posix-testsuite/tests/link/03.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 16 Failed: 2)
> Failed tests: 8-9
>
> expect 0 link ${n0} ${path1023} #8
> expect 0 unlink ${path1023} #9
>
> I gotta go for the day, I'll try to repro outside the script tomorrow.
As a data point, people have occasionally mentioned to me in IRC
and via email that these "posix" tests fail for them... even when
run against a (non-glustered) ext4/xfs filesystem. So, it _could_
be just some weird spurious thing. If you figure out what though,
that'd be cool. :)
+ Justin
--
GlusterFS - http://www.gluster.org
An open source, distributed file system scaling to several
petabytes, and handling thousands of clients.
My personal twitter: twitter.com/realjustinclift
_______________________________________________
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
