----- Original Message ----- > From: "Pranith Kumar Karampuri" <pkarampu@xxxxxxxxxx> > To: "Justin Clift" <justin@xxxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: "Gluster Devel" <gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx> > Sent: Monday, May 19, 2014 11:20:21 AM > Subject: Re: Spurious failures because of nfs and snapshots > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Justin Clift" <justin@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > To: "Pranith Kumar Karampuri" <pkarampu@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Cc: "Gluster Devel" <gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > Sent: Monday, 19 May, 2014 10:41:03 AM > > Subject: Re: Spurious failures because of nfs and snapshots > > > > On 19/05/2014, at 6:00 AM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote: > > <snip> > > > This particular class is eliminated :-). Patch was merged on Friday. > > > > > > Excellent. I've just kicked off 10 instances in Rackspace to each run > > the regression tests on master head. > > > > Hopefully less than 1/2 of them fail this time. Has been about 30% > > pass rate recently. :) > > I am working on one more patch about timeouts at the moment. Will be sending > it shortly. That should help us manage waiting for timeouts easily. > With the work kaushal, vijay did for providing logs, core files, we should be > able to reduce the number of spurious regressions. Because now, we can debug > them without stopping running of regressions :-). The patch is now ready for review at http://review.gluster.com/7799. Intention of the patch is to make sure similar events wait for same time for those events to happen. i.e. EXPECT_WITHIN related ones. So next time some event stops completing the action in the expected time-limit and we want to increase the timeout, we only have to change it in one place. Pranith > > Pranith > > > > + Justin > > > > -- > > Open Source and Standards @ Red Hat > > > > twitter.com/realjustinclift > > > > > _______________________________________________ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
