Re: Spurious failures because of nfs and snapshots

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




----- Original Message -----
> From: "Justin Clift" <justin@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: "Pranith Kumar Karampuri" <pkarampu@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: "Gluster Devel" <gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Monday, 19 May, 2014 10:41:03 AM
> Subject: Re:  Spurious failures because of nfs and snapshots
> 
> On 19/05/2014, at 6:00 AM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote:
> <snip>
> > This particular class is eliminated :-). Patch was merged on Friday.
> 
> 
> Excellent.  I've just kicked off 10 instances in Rackspace to each run
> the regression tests on master head.
> 
> Hopefully less than 1/2 of them fail this time.  Has been about 30%
> pass rate recently. :)

I am working on one more patch about timeouts at the moment. Will be sending it shortly. That should help us manage waiting for timeouts easily.
With the work kaushal, vijay did for providing logs, core files, we should be able to reduce the number of spurious regressions. Because now, we can debug them without stopping running of regressions :-).

Pranith
> 
> + Justin
> 
> --
> Open Source and Standards @ Red Hat
> 
> twitter.com/realjustinclift
> 
> 
_______________________________________________
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel




[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Users]     [Ceph Users]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux