On 13-05-28 07:08 PM, Justin Clift wrote: > Automatic bots like that are also pretty rude. People can take > many hours of their time putting together patches... to then have > them auto-rejected without someone even looking at them is crappy. There's a right way and a wrong way to do this, certainly. There's a world of difference between: "Sorry, we not accept pull requests here. [CLOSED]" and: "Thank you for your contribution to Gluster! Code submissions and review actually happen at $URL, not here at GitHub. Please review the [Contribution Guidelines] and submit your request using this process." > I know of some projects that do this, and it's not good. Not sure > of "the right way" to do this though. :/ Speaking from experience[1]¸it'd be a lot nicer to get immediate feedback with a nudge to the correct submission process than to have it sit idle for 4 days and only see crickets. You don't even have to close it; let the OP do that. M. [1]: https://github.com/gluster/glusterfs/pull/14 -- Michael Brown | `One of the main causes of the fall of Systems Consultant | the Roman Empire was that, lacking zero, Net Direct Inc. | they had no way to indicate successful ☎: +1 519 883 1172 x5106 | termination of their C programs.' - Firth
