On 04/30/2013 06:10 AM, Jeff Darcy wrote:
On 04/29/2013 01:38 PM, Vijay Bellur wrote:
There are a lot of places where we make an
implicit assumption that GF_CALLOC and the likes memset the memory area
to zero.
Actually I was a bit disturbed recently when I found that at least one
member of that family (don't remember which) *doesn't* do that. I meant
to go through and check which code relied on that unmet assumption, but
then something else came up and I never got back to it.
I did a quick scan of mem-pool.c but failed to notice anything obvious.
If you happen to notice it again, it should be worth a patch.
-Vijay
