On 04/29/2013 01:38 PM, Vijay Bellur wrote: > There are a lot of places where we make an > implicit assumption that GF_CALLOC and the likes memset the memory area > to zero. Actually I was a bit disturbed recently when I found that at least one member of that family (don't remember which) *doesn't* do that. I meant to go through and check which code relied on that unmet assumption, but then something else came up and I never got back to it.
