Re: Glusterd: A New Hope

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 24/03/2013, at 8:55 AM, Stephan von Krawczynski wrote:
<snip>
> ... the most
> important question: the performance tuning. We all know that glusterfs can be
> unbelievably slow if you tuned the wrong switches. And really, finding the
> right ones is very hard, even for very experienced administrators.
> So instead of becoming "autonomous" (i.e. never be successful, I mean you just
> said you cannot solve this by yourself and want to drop it on external
> know-how) it would be a lot better to make some tuning-tool that analyses a
> situation and gives hints how performance can be optimized - but not tuning it
> by itself of course.

Hmmm, some form of situational tuning sounds like an interesting idea.

Any idea what kind of statistics/counters it would need to be aware of or
somehow be able to measure?

Regards and best wishes,

Justin Clift

--
Open Source and Standards @ Red Hat

twitter.com/realjustinclift




[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Users]     [Ceph Users]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux