On 03/22/2013 02:20 PM, Anand Avati wrote:e > The point is that it was never a question of performance - it was to > just get basic functionality "working". I stand corrected. Here's the amended statement. "The need for some change here is keenly felt right now as we struggle to fix all of the race conditions that have resulted from the hasty addition of synctasks to make up for poor event handling elsewhere in that 44K lines of C."
