Re: inodes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Amar Tumballi <amarts@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> http://review.gluster.com/613 <--- for distribute itransform removing.

> With rebalance feature to be done inside distribute, most of the
> other fixes which went in only in master branch are also backported
>
> as part of rebalance, more syncops are added.

That one is huge. It brings ino fixes along with a lot of other changes.
Should I just extract the inode relevant part? Or is the whole change
self-contained (I mean not dependent on other changes) and will only
bring benefits?

-- 
Emmanuel Dreyfus
http://hcpnet.free.fr/pubz
manu@xxxxxxxxxx



[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Users]     [Ceph Users]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux