Re: GlusterFS vs xfs w/ inode64 (was: Missing files?)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Liam Slusser <lslusser@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Matthias,
> 
> Just to run a few more tests....
> 
> Centos 5.3 x86_64 on all systems in my test
[...]
> 
> The ifree number didnt change after i ran the tests, all the files
> look to be fine and intact - so as far as i can tell everything is
> working fine.
> 
> Did your tests show something else?

I guess the catch is that we have all of our clients running RHEL5
i386, and Avati pointed out that there is a limitation inside the fuse
client library, which is the one we seem to be hitting.

If anyone has a tested patch for fuse to work around this, then we'd be
very interested in trying it out!

Matthias




[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Users]     [Ceph Users]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux