On Tue, 17 Jun 2008, Amar S. Tumballi wrote:
Hi Brent,
Thanks for reporting it. Strange that it failed to compile on your machine.
It worked fine on my machine hence I committed it. Mostly looks like some
gcc/glibc version issue (I use gcc - 4.1.2). Anyways, I have made the commit
to solve that issue. It should be fine now.
Regards,
Amar
On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 3:26 PM, Brent A Nelson <brent@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Tue, 17 Jun 2008, Raghavendra G wrote:
Hi Brent,
I've committed a fix in glusterfs--mainline--3.0--patch-194. This patch
aims
to fix high memory usage during multiple dd s. Can you please check
whether
it works?
It compiles fine now, and indeed, the memory usage patch worked
beautifully. glusterfsd memory consumption is now rock solid and small,
even while handling heavy dd traffic. rsync and cp -a of /usr also seem
to be much faster now, for some reason.
Any ideas on the two cp -a and rsync issues I reported earlier in this
thread (cp -a fails to preserve directory permissions, both fail to
preserve setuid bit)? Once those are out of the way, rsync and cp -a
should be able to make perfect copies on a GlusterFS.
Thanks,
Brent
