I will be doing it today, and will reply back in this thread. On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 9:55 AM, Dan Parsons <dparsons@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > Any luck on documenting this? I'd relaly like to set it up. > > > Dan Parsons > > > > On May 10, 2008, at 1:10 PM, Anand Babu Periasamy wrote: > > Hi Gordan, > > "option transport-type unix/server" is available. Even better approach > > is to > > run in single address mode (server and client merged into single > > process). > > > > I will have Amar document it. > > > > We are also introducing binary protocol and non-blocking sockets in the > > next release which will improve performance significantly. > > > > -- > > Anand Babu Periasamy > > GPG Key ID: 0x62E15A31 > > Blog [http://ab.freeshell.org] > > The GNU Operating System [http://www.gnu.org] > > Z RESEARCH Inc [http://www.zresearch.com] > > > > > > > > Gordan Bobic wrote: > > > > > Is there a way to mount locally via a unix domain socket rather than > > > via loopback interface? It seems rather wasteful to be passing all the > > > traffic through the TCP/IP stack for a local mount in cases when the server > > > is also a client for the shared mount. > > > i.e. is there something like "option transport-type unix/client"? > > > Gordan > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Gluster-devel mailing list > > > Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxx > > > http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Gluster-devel mailing list > > Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxx > > http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel > > > > > > -- Amar Tumballi Gluster/GlusterFS Hacker [bulde on #gluster/irc.gnu.org] http://www.zresearch.com - Commoditizing Super Storage!
