Re: Connecting via unix socket instead of IP socket

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Any luck on documenting this? I'd relaly like to set it up.


Dan Parsons


On May 10, 2008, at 1:10 PM, Anand Babu Periasamy wrote:

Hi Gordan,
"option transport-type unix/server" is available. Even better approach is to run in single address mode (server and client merged into single process).

I will have Amar document it.

We are also introducing binary protocol and non-blocking sockets in the
next release which will improve performance significantly.

--
Anand Babu Periasamy
GPG Key ID: 0x62E15A31
Blog [http://ab.freeshell.org]
The GNU Operating System [http://www.gnu.org]
Z RESEARCH Inc [http://www.zresearch.com]



Gordan Bobic wrote:
Is there a way to mount locally via a unix domain socket rather than via loopback interface? It seems rather wasteful to be passing all the traffic through the TCP/IP stack for a local mount in cases when the server is also a client for the shared mount.
i.e. is there something like "option transport-type unix/client"?
Gordan
_______________________________________________
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel


_______________________________________________
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel






[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Users]     [Ceph Users]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux