Resending to list ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Raghavendra G <raghavendra.hg@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Dec 12, 2007 11:59 AM Subject: Re: epoll.c bug To: Thierry EXCOFFIER <exco@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> On Dec 12, 2007 1:46 AM, Thierry EXCOFFIER <exco@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Anand Avati wrote: > > thanks for the gdb traces. this looks like the epoll() call in your > system > > (ARM processor platform) is broken. the epoll in your case has returned > 3 > > but the 2'nd and 3'rd entries are junk. can you also get me the output > of "p > > *ectx" from frame 2 ? > > There is no 'ectx' in frame 2, only in frame 3. > I keep the 'core' if you have other questions. > > > you might want to use poll which I feel might be more reliable. > currently > > the only way to 'force' poll is to move away sys/epoll.h during > ./configure > > (sorry, will add a --disable-epoll soon :D) and recompile. > Added --disable-epoll in glusterfs--mainline--2.5--patch-609 > > Yes ! > It works, with '-O0' or the '-O3' compilation option. > > Thierry. > -- > Thierry.EXCOFFIER@@liris.univ-lyon1.fr// GO: Oriental Strategy Game > LIRIS/UFR Informatique, bat710 //DYLAN: Programming Language > Universite Claude Bernard LYON 1 __// UNIX: Standard Operating System > 43 Bd du 11 novembre 1918 // > 69622 VILLEURBANNE, FRANCE //WWW: http://www710.univ-lyon1.fr/~exco<http://www710.univ-lyon1.fr/%7Eexco> > > > _______________________________________________ > Gluster-devel mailing list > Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel > -- Raghavendra G A centipede was happy quite, until a toad in fun, Said, "Prey, which leg comes after which?", This raised his doubts to such a pitch, He fell flat into the ditch, Not knowing how to run. -Anonymous -- Raghavendra G A centipede was happy quite, until a toad in fun, Said, "Prey, which leg comes after which?", This raised his doubts to such a pitch, He fell flat into the ditch, Not knowing how to run. -Anonymous
