Hi, yes, there is *some* leak in glusterfs. We are trying to corner it out right now. Thanks, -bulde On 7/5/07, Dale Dude <dale@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I see the same memory issue. They know about it and I believe are trying to resolve it. Dale Rhesa Rozendaal wrote: > Thanks, Harris. > > I tried it without io-threads to see what that would result in: > > 7218 root 17 0 476m 464m 844 R 85 23.0 41:15.20 [glusterfs] > > It did increase a lot slower this time, but still nowhere near your > numbers. I'll see what happens when disabling one of read-ahead and > write-behind, and then both. I'd like to know where this memory usage > comes from, because I don't think I can deploy it like this yet. > > I'm on 275, btw. > > Rhesa > > Harris Landgarten wrote: >> Rheas, >> >> My setup is very similar to yours but I am not using io-threads on >> the client (only on servers) and I have 2 bricks. This is my top >> >> 4522 root 15 0 14812 5420 848 S 0.0 0.3 0:11.03 glusterfs >> >> Quite a difference. >> >> Harris >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Rhesa Rozendaal" <gluster@xxxxxxxxx> >> To: "gluster-devel" <gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxx> >> Sent: Thursday, July 5, 2007 10:57:41 AM (GMT-0500) America/New_York >> Subject: memory usage (client) >> >> Hi guys, >> >> I've been trying to limit glusterfs' memory consumption, but so far >> not much luck. >> >> here's a snapshot of my "top": >> 6697 root 15 0 369m 295m 876 S 45 14.6 3:10.13 >> [glusterfs] >> >> And it keeps growing, so I'm not sure where it'll settle. Is there >> anything I can do to keep it to around 100m? > > > > _______________________________________________ > Gluster-devel mailing list > Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel > _______________________________________________ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
-- Amar Tumballi http://amar.80x25.org [bulde on #gluster/irc.gnu.org]
