I see the same memory issue. They know about it and I believe are trying
to resolve it.
Dale
Rhesa Rozendaal wrote:
Thanks, Harris.
I tried it without io-threads to see what that would result in:
7218 root 17 0 476m 464m 844 R 85 23.0 41:15.20 [glusterfs]
It did increase a lot slower this time, but still nowhere near your
numbers. I'll see what happens when disabling one of read-ahead and
write-behind, and then both. I'd like to know where this memory usage
comes from, because I don't think I can deploy it like this yet.
I'm on 275, btw.
Rhesa
Harris Landgarten wrote:
Rheas,
My setup is very similar to yours but I am not using io-threads on
the client (only on servers) and I have 2 bricks. This is my top
4522 root 15 0 14812 5420 848 S 0.0 0.3 0:11.03 glusterfs
Quite a difference.
Harris
----- Original Message -----
From: "Rhesa Rozendaal" <gluster@xxxxxxxxx>
To: "gluster-devel" <gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, July 5, 2007 10:57:41 AM (GMT-0500) America/New_York
Subject: memory usage (client)
Hi guys,
I've been trying to limit glusterfs' memory consumption, but so far
not much luck.
here's a snapshot of my "top":
6697 root 15 0 369m 295m 876 S 45 14.6 3:10.13
[glusterfs]
And it keeps growing, so I'm not sure where it'll settle. Is there
anything I can do to keep it to around 100m?
_______________________________________________
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
