On 5/2/07, Krishna Srinivas <krishna@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 5/2/07, John Rowe <rowe@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > > >Try comma as the separator. > > > > > > > >option auth.ip.brick.allow 111.222.111.1,111.222.111.2,111.222.111.2 > > I'm sure several of us can confirm that it doesn't let us in if we get > the syntax wrong! But I think the situation is confused by the fact > that: > > a) It doesn't seem to be documented. > > b) It's rather unforgiving and unintuitive - could we follow common > practise and allow whitespace to follow the comma? I will change the code to ignore the whitespaces ....
oops this is not possible ....we'll see how this can be helped. As of now comma with out spaces has to be used. Krishna
> > Thanks > > John > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Gluster-devel mailing list > Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel >
