On 5/2/07, John Rowe <rowe@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > > >Try comma as the separator. > > > > > >option auth.ip.brick.allow 111.222.111.1,111.222.111.2,111.222.111.2 I'm sure several of us can confirm that it doesn't let us in if we get the syntax wrong! But I think the situation is confused by the fact that: a) It doesn't seem to be documented. b) It's rather unforgiving and unintuitive - could we follow common practise and allow whitespace to follow the comma?
I will change the code to ignore the whitespaces ....
Thanks John _______________________________________________ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
