On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 02:20:17PM +0200, Pierre Poissinger wrote:
> > #define IS_RUN_COMMAND_ERR(x) ((-x) > ERR_RUN_COMMAND_FORK)
> oops... works for me with
> #define IS_RUN_COMMAND_ERR(x) (-(x) > ERR_RUN_COMMAND_FORK)
Oops, it should actually be "-(x) >= ERR_RUN_COMMAND_FORK". But it
shouldn't make a difference in your test, since x was '0' in your case.
Junio, I think this patch should take care of it.
-- >8 --
Subject: [PATCH] fix portability problem with IS_RUN_COMMAND_ERR
Some old versions of gcc don't seem to like us negating an
enum constant. Let's work around it by negating the other
half of the comparison instead.
Reported by Pierre Poissinger on gcc 2.9.
---
run-command.h | 2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/run-command.h b/run-command.h
index 15e870a..e345502 100644
--- a/run-command.h
+++ b/run-command.h
@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ enum {
ERR_RUN_COMMAND_WAITPID_SIGNAL,
ERR_RUN_COMMAND_WAITPID_NOEXIT,
};
-#define IS_RUN_COMMAND_ERR(x) ((x) <= -ERR_RUN_COMMAND_FORK)
+#define IS_RUN_COMMAND_ERR(x) (-(x) >= ERR_RUN_COMMAND_FORK)
struct child_process {
const char **argv;
--
1.6.2.1.591.geb450
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
