Re: [PATCH] Define a version of lstat(2) with posix semantics

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

On Fri, 20 Mar 2009, Alex Riesen wrote:

> 2009/3/20 Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@xxxxxx>:
> > Now, we _do_ have msysGit, you _do_ have shown the capability to fix 
> > issues when they arise, so I do _not_ see any obstacle why you should 
> > not go msysGit, rather than staying with the pain of trying to stay 
> > POSIX-compatible, but not quite all the time.
> 
> I understand. It is not pure POSIX compatibility I seek. I just can't 
> use MinGW port, because I absolutely must use the cygwin environment 
> (for "hysterical" reasons) and they don't play well together (tried, 
> yes. Conflicting libraries, but you already know that).

Maybe we can work on those conflicting libraries?  After all, we do have a 
"rebase.exe" tool now (for all those as puzzled by the naming as I was: 
the rebase.exe tool can shift the memory range used by a .dll so that it 
does not overlap with that one of another .dll).

Ciao,
Dscho
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux