Re: [PATCH] Define a version of lstat(2) with posix semantics

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

On Thu, 19 Mar 2009, Alex Riesen wrote:

> Johannes Schindelin, Thu, Mar 19, 2009 11:57:01 +0100:
> 
> > I'd rather just disable WIN32_STAT for Cygwin, because otherwise, we 
> > will keep running into issues.
> 
> I'd rather not. The thing is just so unbelievably slow and being stuck 
> on it I'm just trying my damnedest to squeeze every last bit of 
> performance out of it.

If you are serious about performance, you will not stay with Cygwin -- for 
the purposes of Git.

Do not get me wrong: Cygwin is a wonderful thing if your goal is to spare 
yourself a lot of trouble with that seriously challenged win32 API.

But if your goal is to get the most out of the Win32 API in terms of 
speed, you _will_ have to go with MinGW (at least, as long as you are 
unwilling to shell out big bucks in the vague direction of Redmond, and 
add some time tax to that).

Now, we _do_ have msysGit, you _do_ have shown the capability to fix 
issues when they arise, so I do _not_ see any obstacle why you should not 
go msysGit, rather than staying with the pain of trying to stay 
POSIX-compatible, but not quite all the time.

Ciao,
Dscho

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux