Kelly F. Hickel schrieb: >> From: git-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:git-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On >> Behalf Of Johannes Sixt >> Sent: Thursday, March 12, 2009 10:38 AM >> To: Kelly F. Hickel > >> $ git branch -a --contains the-sha1 >> >> -- Hannes >> > > Thanks, that looks like a really useful command. > > Unfortunately, in this case it didn't print anything out (neither did > "git branch -r -a sha1"). > > What I'm beginning to suspect is that all the commits that should have > gone to master went to some unnamed branch. > Is that reasonable/possible/likely? This commit has a full ancestry, > but doesn't appear to be on any branch. > > In the above question there's an assumption that if a branch exists > without a name, then git branch -a --contains wouldn't print anything > out, is that correct? Correct. Your best bet is perhaps that you create a branch at the commit $ git branch tmp-branch your_sha1 so that the commits are not lost, then you cherry-pick them to master. -- Hannes -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
