> From: git-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:git-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On > Behalf Of Johannes Sixt > Sent: Thursday, March 12, 2009 10:38 AM > To: Kelly F. Hickel > $ git branch -a --contains the-sha1 > > -- Hannes > Thanks, that looks like a really useful command. Unfortunately, in this case it didn't print anything out (neither did "git branch -r -a sha1"). What I'm beginning to suspect is that all the commits that should have gone to master went to some unnamed branch. Is that reasonable/possible/likely? This commit has a full ancestry, but doesn't appear to be on any branch. In the above question there's an assumption that if a branch exists without a name, then git branch -a --contains wouldn't print anything out, is that correct? Thanks, Kelly -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
