Re: [PATCH] '%S' option for pretty printing to support --source

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Mar 05, 2009 at 02:41:44PM -0500, Deskin Miller wrote:

> >  - gracefully block concurrent use of conflicting features
> 
> I agree that any blocking should be graceful, but ultimately I find
> the idea of disallowing features because they happen to use the same
> underlying implementation distasteful.  With a little work we should
> be able to allow both with no problem.

Yes, I would prefer to avoid blocking if at all possible. But I included
it as a last resort until things can be fixed correctly. IOW, by
"graceful" I just meant "die with an error instead of segfaulting".
Which would still arguably be a bug, but at least would clue the user in
to what is happening.

Anyway, happy moving and I'll look forward to seeing your patch when it
is ready. :)

-Peff
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux