On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 12:39 PM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I don't mind pulling, as it is less work for me, but it would make > harder for others to see the changes in flight and discuss, so... > > Even though I'd need to re-read them before merging them to 'next', I also > think the earlier remote-set-head series and Jeff's changes on top of it > looked more or less reasonable. Perhaps I should rebase them on top of > 'master' before moving them to 'next' and then you can build on top, which > would reduce your new series by about 10 commits. Putting Jeff's changes first reduces churn a small amount, as we don't introduce new code just to change it a few commits later in the same topic. So it keeps the history marginally cleaner. That was my thinking anyway. Otherwise you may as well just use what I sent last night and let me add one more patch on-top to clean-up that unused variable that gets passed to get_head_names(). Your call. :-) j. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
