On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 4:50 AM, Jay Soffian <jaysoffian@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Jay Soffian (18): > builtin-clone: move locate_head() to remote.c so it can be re-used > builtin-remote: move duplicated cleanup code its own function > builtin-remote: teach show to display remote HEAD > builtin-remote: add set-head subcommand > builtin-remote: better handling of multiple remote HEADs > > remote.c: make match_refs() copy src ref before assigning to peer_ref > remote.c: don't short-circuit match_refs() when error in match_explicit_refs() > refactor duplicated get_local_heads() to remote.c > refactor duplicated ref_newer() to remote.c > string-list: new for_each_string_list() function > builtin-remote: rename variable and eliminate redundant function call > builtin-remote: name remote_refs consistently > builtin-remote: remove unused code in get_ref_states > builtin-remote: fix two inconsistencies in the output of "show <remote>" > builtin-remote: make get_remote_ref_states() always populate states.tracked > builtin-remote: refactor get_remote_ref_states() > builtin-remote: new show output style > builtin-remote: new show output style for push refspecs > > Jeff King (5): > test scripts: refactor start_httpd helper > add basic http clone/fetch tests > refactor find_refs_by_name to accept const list > remote: refactor guess_remote_head > remote: use exact HEAD lookup if it is available Argh. Looking at this again, it seems clear to me now that I should've put Jeff's series at the beginning, followed by my refactoring (6-10), followed by the rest of my patches, so that all the refactoring is early. And I forgot that I'd done patch #5 (better handling of multiple remote HEADs) a few days after 1-4. As part of this re-roll I should've redone 1-4 to include #5's functionality. I also noticed I'm passing an argument to get_head_names() that it never uses. But fixing that touches at least 3 of the patches. All of this is my way of saying ignore what I've emailed tonight till I can clean it up a bit more. I apologize to the list for the spam. When I have the series really ready, would you prefer I setup a repo for you to pull from? I'm loath to spam the list with another 24 messages. j. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html