Alex Riesen <raa.lkml@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > 2009/2/18 Kjetil Barvik <barvik@xxxxxxxxxxxx>: >> If we can trust the numbers from oprofile in this case, we saved >> approximately ((7710 - 46) * 20000) / (2 * 1000 * 1000 * 1000) = 0.077 >> seconds CPU time with this fix for this particular test. And notice >> that now the CPU did only 46 / 15 = 3.1 cycles/instruction. > ... >> diff --git a/unpack-trees.c b/unpack-trees.c >> index e3c3fa1..273b5da 100644 >> --- a/unpack-trees.c >> +++ b/unpack-trees.c >> @@ -93,11 +93,9 @@ static int check_updates(struct unpack_trees_options *o) >> display_progress(progress, ++cnt); >> if (o->update) >> unlink_entry(ce); >> - remove_index_entry_at(&o->result, i); >> - i--; >> - continue; >> } >> } >> + remove_marked_cache_entries(&o->result); >> remove_scheduled_dirs(); >> > > What commit is this change based on? It does not apply to any > of Junio's master, next, or pu... It was based on 'pu', and not a uptodate one. Sorry about that, I will update the patch based on master, and include it together with the 2 'USE_NSEC'-patches, which I posted some few days ago. -- kjetil -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
