Re: [PATCH] check_updates(): effective removal of cache entries marked CE_REMOVE

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



2009/2/18 Kjetil Barvik <barvik@xxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> If we can trust the numbers from oprofile in this case, we saved
> approximately ((7710 - 46) * 20000) / (2 * 1000 * 1000 * 1000) = 0.077
> seconds CPU time with this fix for this particular test.  And notice
> that now the CPU did only 46 / 15 = 3.1 cycles/instruction.
...
> diff --git a/unpack-trees.c b/unpack-trees.c
> index e3c3fa1..273b5da 100644
> --- a/unpack-trees.c
> +++ b/unpack-trees.c
> @@ -93,11 +93,9 @@ static int check_updates(struct unpack_trees_options *o)
>                        display_progress(progress, ++cnt);
>                        if (o->update)
>                                unlink_entry(ce);
> -                       remove_index_entry_at(&o->result, i);
> -                       i--;
> -                       continue;
>                }
>        }
> +       remove_marked_cache_entries(&o->result);
>        remove_scheduled_dirs();
>

What commit is this change based on? It does not apply to any
of Junio's master, next, or pu...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux