Re: [PATCH] Use DIFF_XDL_SET/DIFF_OPT_SET instead of raw bit-masking

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

On Mon, 16 Feb 2009, Keith Cascio wrote:

> 
> Signed-off-by: Keith Cascio <keith@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---

Rationale?

If you are going to add something on top of that, I can understand that, 
but this patch is not labeled [1/n].  And...

>  diff.h |    3 +++
>  diff.c |   17 ++++++++++-------
>  2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

... this does not look good to me, without a compelling reason why we want 
to have the patch nevertheless.

Ciao,
Dscho
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux