Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@xxxxxx> writes:
> In the name of consistency, I'd rather leave show-branch as it is.
Yes, Nana explained why I was wrong on this one.
> However, IMO there is a much worse issue lurking: people might want to
> _know_ what "@{-2}" would expand to, _without_ switching branches.
"git branch --history" anyone?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
