Re: [PATCH v3] parse-opt: migrate builtin-ls-files.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 07:16:38PM -0800, Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Miklos Vajna <vmiklos@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> 
> > Was this dropped on the floor by accident?
> 
> I am not fundamentally opposed to the parseopt conversion, but I was
> somewhat discouraged from taking another one, after we got burned by the
> one that converted git-apply without much visible gain but with a new bug.
> 
> Because ls-files is a plumbing, it has somewhat lower priority for user
> friendliness than any other patches currently in-flight on the list; hence
> it has been backburnered.  It still is kept in my Inbox.

I'm just asking again as I see the parseopt patch for builtin-config now
on the list.

Should I just resend this patch after v1.6.2?

Attachment: pgpTVluuQmE43.pgp
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux