On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 07:16:38PM -0800, Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I am not fundamentally opposed to the parseopt conversion, but I was > somewhat discouraged from taking another one, after we got burned by the > one that converted git-apply without much visible gain but with a new bug. > > Because ls-files is a plumbing, it has somewhat lower priority for user > friendliness than any other patches currently in-flight on the list; hence > it has been backburnered. It still is kept in my Inbox. Makes sense, thanks for the answer.
Attachment:
pgpO74KHedfyk.pgp
Description: PGP signature
