Re: [PATCH 2/4] completion: Use consistent if [...] convention. No test.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Ted Pavlic <ted@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> -		if [ -d "$g/rebase-apply" ]
> -		then
> -			if test -f "$g/rebase-apply/rebasing"
> -			then
> +		if [ -d "$g/rebase-apply" ]; then
> +			if [ -f "$g/rebase-apply/rebasing" ]; then
>  				r="|REBASE"
> -			elif test -f "$g/rebase-apply/applying"
> -			then
> +            elif [ -f "$g/rebase-apply/applying" ]; then
>  				r="|AM"
>  			else

What's with this funny indentation?

As a general rule, it usually is a good idea to apply clean-up to the
codebase before starting substantial work, but that holds true only when
the clean-up is undisputed.  Otherwise you would end up holding the later,
more "interesting" work a hostage to an earlier potentially controversial
"clean-up".

I think this particular clean-up makes the odd-ball __git_ps1 more
consnstent with the rest of the script, but it ultimately is Shawn's
call.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux