Re: RFC: Flat directory for notes, or fan-out? Both!

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Thomas Rast <trast@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Johannes Schindelin wrote:
>> Or we could use an on-disk hashmap.  Oh, wait...
>
> While reading this thread, I sure wondered ... why don't we use the
> one on-disk fast access structure we already have: the index?

Since when the index has become a on-disk fast access structure?

> Sure, one problem is that the index reading code is inherently written
> for a single index state.

That's wrong, but because the index is not a on-disk fast access structure
to begin with, the incorrect statement about it is excused ;-)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux