Re: RFC: Flat directory for notes, or fan-out? Both!

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Thomas Rast wrote:
> Sure, one problem is that the index reading code is inherently written
> for a single index state.  However, all notes consumers I can
> currently think of (show, log, anything that displays commit messages)
> do not have to access the "real" index.
[...]
> At a (*very*) cursory glance at read-cache.c, it seems that there is
> even support for having several index structures in memory at once,
> making this easy.  And it looks like reading the cache is more or less
> memcpy() if xmmap() is fast (Windows would suffer once again).

Note to self: do not write mail on bus, then pick up later at home.

-- 
Thomas Rast
trast@{inf,student}.ethz.ch

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux