In the show_new_revisions function, the original code: git rev-parse --not --branches | grep -v $(git rev-parse $refname) | isn't quite right since one can create a new branch and push it without any new commits. In that case, two refs will have the same sha1 but both would get filtered by the 'grep'. In the end, we'll show ALL the history which is not what we want. Instead, we should list the branches by name and remove the branch being updated and THEN pass that list through rev-parse. Revised as suggested by Jakub Narebski <jnareb@xxxxxxxxx> to use git-for-each-ref instead of git-branch. (Thanks!) Signed-off-by: Pat Notz <pknotz@xxxxxxxxxx> --- contrib/hooks/post-receive-email | 4 +++- 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/contrib/hooks/post-receive-email b/contrib/hooks/post-receive-email index 28a3c0e..ec52751 100644 --- a/contrib/hooks/post-receive-email +++ b/contrib/hooks/post-receive-email @@ -615,7 +615,9 @@ show_new_revisions() revspec=$oldrev..$newrev fi - git rev-parse --not --branches | grep -v $(git rev-parse $refname) | + other_branches=$(git for-each-ref --format='%(refname)' refs/heads/ | + grep -v $refname) + git rev-parse --not $other_branches | if [ -z "$custom_showrev" ] then git rev-list --pretty --stdin $revspec -- 1.6.1.2 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
