Robin Rosenberg <robin.rosenberg@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> måndag 09 februari 2009 07:04:46 skrev Junio C Hamano:
>> What's troubling more is that this would seem to leave the result even
>> more inconsistent if there are more than one packs that need to be
>> replaced.
>
> Why? We don't prune the old objects if we fail. The result might be a lot
> of redundancy, but nothing should be lost.
I was not talking about any loss. The result would be a funny mixture of
permutations of {old-,}pack-*.{pack,idx} the user needs to match up after
figuring out what corresponds with what other one, and I think an expert
who is asked for help would have hard time matching them up too, even
though that is what you suggested in the message.
That troubled me and I was wondering if we can make the recovery simpler
for the users.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
