Re: Comments on "Understanding Version Control" by Eric S. Raymond

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Miles Bader <miles@xxxxxxx>:
> Theodore Tso <tytso@xxxxxxx> writes:
> > I suspect Eric will disagree with me, but regardless of how he
> > completes his paper, it will almost certainly end up taking sides one
> > way or another on this controversy, at which point one side or the
> > other of this particular disagreement will argue that Eric is really
> > writing an advocacy paper pushing Bzr, Mercurial, or Git (depending on
> > how he comes out on this issue).
> 
> That was pretty clear from his comments on the emacs-devel mailing list
> (2008-05 roughly).
> 
> He spent a lot of time trying to sound impartial (and that he was "still
> doing research"), but strongly gave the impression that he had already
> made up his mind.

At the time, I leaned slightly towards Mercurial, but my reasons had
nothing to do with the cluster of issues Ted is pointing at; rather, I
liked hg for its interface simplicity.

I remain agnostic about the deep issues around renaming and user
intentions - in part because I'm by no means sure I completely
understand them yet.
-- 
		<a href="http://www.catb.org/~esr/";>Eric S. Raymond</a>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux