Op dinsdag 03-02-2009 om 11:43 uur [tijdzone -0800], schreef Stefan Karpinski: > On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 8:58 AM, Michael J Gruber > <git@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > Not yet another one, please! > > > > I'm sorry, but that was my first thought. I lost count of how many > > half-finished GUIs we have, using tcl/tk, gtk, qt, you-name-it-tk. I > > still don't see any which provide a consistent, "modern", stable GUI for > > viewing *and* committing, i.e. a replacement for gitk and git-gui. > > > > The latter two still seem to be the most feature rich choices, but they > > suffer somewhat from their implementation language. Just look at the git > > survey and you know why nobody wants to work on them. > > For what it's worth, GitX (OS X only) does both history viewing and > committing, and seems to be rapidly approaching the feature set of > gitk and git-gui combined. Unfortunately, I seem to inevitably hate > cross-platform GUI's---they never feel right or work slickly enough. > Sad, but true. This is the reason why I'm developing gitg as a separate application, and not as a different front end for GitX. > If GitX and this newer project could share a lot of code base, then > maybe their co-development would be accelerated and both would end up > being slick, native, full-fledged GUIs for git. I try to follow the implementation of GitX very closely since it's the basis of the development of gitg (it happens to be that I know the developer of GitX very well). -- Jesse van den Kieboom Personal: http://www.icecrew.nl Professional: http://www.novowork.com -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
