On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 8:58 AM, Michael J Gruber <git@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Not yet another one, please! > > I'm sorry, but that was my first thought. I lost count of how many > half-finished GUIs we have, using tcl/tk, gtk, qt, you-name-it-tk. I > still don't see any which provide a consistent, "modern", stable GUI for > viewing *and* committing, i.e. a replacement for gitk and git-gui. > > The latter two still seem to be the most feature rich choices, but they > suffer somewhat from their implementation language. Just look at the git > survey and you know why nobody wants to work on them. For what it's worth, GitX (OS X only) does both history viewing and committing, and seems to be rapidly approaching the feature set of gitk and git-gui combined. Unfortunately, I seem to inevitably hate cross-platform GUI's---they never feel right or work slickly enough. Sad, but true. If GitX and this newer project could share a lot of code base, then maybe their co-development would be accelerated and both would end up being slick, native, full-fledged GUIs for git. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
