Re: Valgrind updates

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

On Wed, 28 Jan 2009, Mark Adler wrote:

> On Jan 28, 2009, at 3:27 PM, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
> >On Wed, 28 Jan 2009, Mark Adler wrote:
> > >2.  Can someone send me the input and the 58 bytes of output from this
> > >  case?
> >
> >I did better than that already...
> >http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/107391
> 
> Johannes,
> 
> Thanks for the input and code.  When I run it, the byte in question at 
> offset 51 is 0x2c.  The output decompresses fine and the result matches 
> the input. If I change the 0x2c to anything else, decompression fails.  
> The 58 bytes are below.
> 
> Can you also send me the 58 bytes of output that you get when you run it?

I get exactly the same 58 bytes.  Together with the fact that the 52nd 
byte is actually required to be 0x2c, I think that maybe valgrind is 
having problems to track that this byte was correctly initialized.

BTW did you have any chance to test the code with valgrind on your 
machine?  It might be related to this here platform (x86_64).

Ciao,
Dscho
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux