Re: Bad objects error since upgrading GitHub servers to 1.6.1

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 12:22:01AM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:

> Nah, I take that back.
> 
> Even the original code does not consider this case an error.
> 
> If you really want that, the revision machinery needs major surgery, as I
> already noted that the design of mark_parents_uninteresting() wants to
> treat a missing uninteresting commit as a non-error event.

Hrm. Never mind my concern, then. I was worried that we were losing some
existing corruption checks, but it seems they are not there in the first
place.

-Peff
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux