Re: Translations [of Documentation] in Git release?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 04:31:17PM +0100, Jakub Narebski wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Jan 2009, Peter Krefting wrote:
> > Jakub Narebski wrote:
> > 
> > > With GUI translations we just use gettext conventions. I don't know
> > > any such convention for docs:
> > 
> > There is a lot of documentation being translated using PO files. po4a -
> > http://po4a.alioth.debian.org/ - is a nice starting point for that.
> 
> I'm not sure if XLIFF wouldn't be better format to use to translate
> _documents_.  Gettext was meant to translate, I think, not very long
> messages in programs.
> 
> Also I am not sure how much support this idea has. True, in last Git
> User's Survey[1] 63% to 76% wanted (parts of) Documentation... but that
> was out of 325 people who answered this question, with 3236 responses
> to survey in total, so numbers are more like 6% - 8%.

On the other hand, the people who would really need the translations
didn't answer the survey at all, since they couldn't read it.

Mike
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux