On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 5:39 AM, Jakub Narebski <jnareb@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, 14 Jan 2009, Giuseppe Bilotta wrote: >> On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 7:17 PM, Jakub Narebski <jnareb@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> On Tue, 13 Jan 2009, Giuseppe Bilotta wrote: > >>>> Can you provide a patch I can apply to my tree for testing to see how >>>> it comes up? >>> >>> Here it is. Note that CSS could be I think reduced. The size of >>> gitweb.perl changes is affected by changing calling convention for >>> git_print_header_html subroutine. >> >> It's funny, I was working on a very similar patch myself a couple of >> days ago, but couldn't get the horizontal filler after the link to >> work properly, which is why I asked on www-style. >> >> I'll test your patch and let you know. > > I am checking 'log' view of git repository; it should have enough > ref markers to test this issue. > > It works also in Konqueror 3.5.3-0.2.fc4... > >>> There is also strange artifact at least in Mozilla 1.17.2: if I hover >>> over ref marker, the subject (title) gets darker background. Curious... >> >> Might be some kind of bug with the capturing vs bubbling phase. > > ...but the same artifact can be seen too. Also I am not entirely > pleased with the way things behave on mouseover. It is a pity that > you cannot style element using CSS2.1 based on the pseudo-class :hover > of descendant element, or/and pseudo-class of sibling element, which > nevertheless overlays given element. I know, I've been needing something like this in other occasion. And that's precisely what I was talking about for the limits of CSS, and why I really wonder if the illegal XHMTL but valid XML shouldn't rather be our option ... -- Giuseppe "Oblomov" Bilotta -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
